It´s described a very difficult situation in which has been some kind of an open conflict related to economics. This person has been in trouble and has to resolve problems in a clear way, exposing them openly, explaining reasons and causes about own actions and other people´s actions.
It´s also indicated that it could be about some kind of legal conflict that is blocking economic prosperity, or just is about a declared discussion between the consultant and some other person with which had initiated a quarrel. Either way, it´s not a hidden conflict and is not in shadows: it´s a situation in which each persona tends to impose and annul the other.
Quarrels and discussions related to the topic are clearly indicated. Family, any compromise bond, assumed roles or confidence relationships could have been the origin for disagreement and on many ocassions the consultant had the need to look for some type of mediation to help balancing finances. In moments, the consultant could not face issues due to the lack of force, having to back off in quarrels.
This had meant that during a long time things had been stagnated. Something or someone openly interposes between the consultant and the economic progress, and attention upon this is called to reflect and observe surrounding circumstances.
Maybe the consultant believes that turning into action and facing who must face introduces chaos in a situation that is already conflictive. However, something had changed during the last years inquired: the consultant had put together necessary means and counts on resources that didn´t have before. It would be convenient to meditate about this to understand that maybe has in hands tools that is not using in the situation, and that in an open discussion probably would have everything to win.
It´s not a moment to stay quiet and either is about to wait for a more propitious moment to try moving forward or advancing towards an enhancement. Things tend to accentuate and the consultant will reaffirm the assumed position in the conflict that is experienced. Without exposing his thoughts, reserving after claiming to whom detriment her economically, that is, after a moment in which much others make force demonstrations between screamings and discussions, it will come another moment, calmer, when it will be slowly noticed a change for better, a time to calculate movements and planning in short and medium terms.
Until the next six months, it won´t still be possible to trace big projects of a greater extent and it will have to observe each situation or chance to evaluate immediate pros and cons for each option or proposal. But there´s a constant through all this time: it´s not convenient to seat and wait and either these are not times to hide oneself or hide what is projected.
The before mentioned reserve refers to quieting the mind, becoming a little more affirmed in what is thought and keeping constant in ideas to gradually advance with grounded feet.
From this basis to action, each movement initiated will be accurate and will take him to achieve little goals in a much more long path for which actually it´s not possible to predict its extent or final horizon: it will have to observe in time what is convenient in the immediate and what decisions diminishes risks to which he might be used to in during the last years.
Anyway, advance won´t be ideal nor fluent, due in part to speed to move won´t be fast and some conflict´s echoes will still pose risks without noticing. It will emerge the roots of the economic conflict, ideas that originated it, needs not satisfied at the right moment and problems´ true causes will be faced. The consultant will action straight on all this as possible, without hiding problems nor intentions, with a quiet mind but solid that will allow deciding when to advance and reclaim what is own, and when remain quiet.
©Julia Pérez Bustamante | All rights reserved